The game of
pairings without champion’s game is a game with full information and can be
calculated throughout. But when we have a champion’s game everything becomes
much-much different. We have to take into account the unpredictable factor –
enemy champion.
How can we
choose our own champion?
1 –
Defender as a champion. Most popular strategy is to play an allcomers army as a
champion. So, we just stabilize the champion’s game and can focus on the game
of pairings. The minus of this method – our powerful army is away and plays
with some opponent’s army that can be not the best choice for the team and can
decrease the outcome.
2 – Army without
good matchups as a champion. If we have an army that we are not possible to use
effectively – we can drop it from hand into a champion’s game. Possibly, it
will be the best possibility to find average pairing for that army. It can be
an attacker that has no targets or defender with 1 very-very bad matchup.
3 – The weakest
army as a champion. Just to drop the weakest army from hand before the game of
pairings main part.
4 –
Counter-champion. We can try to predict enemy champion and set the best army to
counter enemy champion. It’s the method to maximize the result, but if you fail
to predict the campion – you can loose by much.
Let’s look
again at a pairings evaluation table (evaluations range from 0 to 20):
Opponent's team
|
|||||||
GK
|
CSM
|
Eld
|
Tyr
|
BA
|
DE
|
||
Our team
|
Eld
|
5
|
13
|
10
|
15
|
11
|
6
|
IG
|
13
|
13
|
16
|
2
|
4
|
16
|
|
Dae
|
15
|
5
|
3
|
2
|
14
|
3
|
|
GK
|
9
|
14
|
13
|
14
|
8
|
13
|
|
SM
|
6
|
5
|
6
|
9
|
16
|
4
|
|
SW
|
6
|
14
|
17
|
16
|
10
|
14
|
The average
value for the table is 10 pts, so it’s the game with equal composition
strength. So, the opponent’s team is as strong as our team. Let’s assume that
we play the final round of the tourney and we need to get a win at all costs! It’s
the situation, when we can try to risk! It’s the right time to follow the point
4 – choosing the counter-champion. If we guessed opponent’s champion – the game
of pairings for us is a game with full information! So, we can calculate it
throughout and find the optimal strategy!
I’ll show
you the example based on the pairings evaluations table given above.
1 – First of
all I have to guess the opponent’s champion. I think that opponent can put only
IG, SM or Nidz as their champ. I assume that the best variant for opponent will
be to set Tyranids as a champion – I go all-in and take it as a fact (but,
actually, It may be a mistake… dramatic mistake). In this example I was so lucky that I guessed
opponent’s champion right.
2 – We set
our champion, according to minimax strategy. It’s SW!
3 – We was not lucky and lost the roll-off. But it’s of no help for our opponent, cause we
already pre-calculated the outcome and we can take minimum 66 points in this
game = victory! (Even with lost roll-off!!!).
4 – We set
SM as our first defender. If you spend some time, toying with minimax strategy –
you’ll find the weakest player to be the best first defender for your team most
of the time!
5 – Our
opponent will make the best attaker-best defender strategy. So, opponent attacks
with DE. Cause we have already played SM, opponent defends with BA. Actually,
it’s a mistake.
6 – Our Daemons
realize their potential in attack on BA and we defend with GK. No surprises here.
7 – Opponent
has no other variant as to attack our GK with his GK.
8 - The
last two pairs is almost automatic and the game table will look like this:
champ
|
SW
|
16
|
Tyr
|
champ
|
1
|
SM
|
4
|
DE
|
2
|
4
|
Dae
|
14
|
BA
|
3
|
5
|
GK
|
9
|
GK
|
6
|
8
|
IG
|
16
|
Eld
|
7
|
9
|
Eld
|
13
|
CSM
|
10
|
72
|
So, I
showed you, how to win the game of pairings with a lucky shot with champion’s
game, besides we’ve lost the roll-off! 72 points is a strong victory in case of
equal strength of teams compositions.
We can use
this strategy against more powerful teams to get a draw or even a victory!
Later on I’ll try to investigate the strategy for the game when we have a
stronger composition then our opponent has. So, I want to win the game without
full information! It must be interesting;)
No comments:
Post a Comment